Re: [PATCH] w1: ds2482: Switch back to use struct i2c_driver's .probe()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:06:46AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/06/2023 09:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Krzysztof,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:10:30PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 12/06/2023 09:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >>> After commit b8a1a4cd5a98 ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
> >>> call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
> >>> commit 03c835f498b5 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
> >>> convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
> >>> .probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/w1/masters/ds2482.c | 2 +-
> >>
> >> Thank you for the patch.
> >> It is too late in the cycle for me to pick it up. I will take it after
> >> the merge window.
> > 
> > This is one of only 19 patches that are still needed on top of what is
> > currently in next before I can drop .probe_new() which I intended to
> > tackle after the upcoming merge window. I expect that most of these 19
> > patches will still be picked up and go into v6.5-rc1.
> > 
> > Assuming there are only less than 10 patches remaining on top of
> > v6.5-rc1, I intend to create a pull request for Wolfram with the
> > remaining bits and a patch doing
> 
> Sure, go ahead:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, but this didn't happen because I missed a few introductions of
new .probe_new. My plan was rescheduled to one merge window later. So if
you want to take this for v6.6-rc1 that would be great.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature