Re: [PATCH v5 04/11] blksnap: header file of the module interface

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 11:53:54AM +0200, Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> > Seems a bit weird to have a signed error code that is always negative.
> > Couldn't this be an unsigned number or directly return the error from
> > the ioctl() itself?
> 
> Yes, it's a good idea to pass the error code as an unsigned value.
> And this positive value can be passed in case of successful execution
> of ioctl(), but I would not like to put different error signs in one value.

Linux tends to use negative error values in basically all interfaces.
I think it will be less confusing to stick to that.