Re: [PATCH] thermal/drivers/sun8i: Don't fail probe due to zone registration failure

From: Jernej Škrabec
Date: Wed Jul 19 2023 - 16:25:03 EST


Dne torek, 18. julij 2023 ob 17:04:22 CEST je Mark Brown napisal(a):
> Currently the sun8i thermal driver will fail to probe if any of the
> thermal zones it is registering fails to register with the thermal core.
> Since we currently do not define any trip points for the GPU thermal
> zones on at least A64 or H5 this means that we have no thermal support
> on these platforms:
>
> [ 1.698703] thermal_sys: Failed to find 'trips' node
> [ 1.698707] thermal_sys: Failed to find trip points for thermal-sensor
> id=1
>
> even though the main CPU thermal zone on both SoCs is fully configured.
> This does not seem ideal, while we may not be able to use all the zones
> it seems better to have those zones which are usable be operational.
> Instead just carry on registering zones if we get any non-deferral
> error, allowing use of those zones which are usable.
>
> This means that we also need to update the interrupt handler to not
> attempt to notify the core for events on zones which we have not
> registered, I didn't see an ability to mask individual interrupts and
> I would expect that interrupts would still be indicated in the ISR even
> if they were masked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Jernej

> ---
> I noticed this while trying to debug an issue with memory corruption on
> boot which since the merge window has prevented Pine64 Plus (an A64)
> from booting at all:
>
>
> https://storage.kernelci.org/mainline/master/v6.5-rc2/arm64/defconfig/gcc-1
> 0/lab-baylibre/baseline-sun50i-a64-pine64-plus.txt
>
> (which I bisected to a random memory management change that clearly
> wasn't at fault) and has been causing less consistent but still very
> severe boot issues on Libretech Tritium (a H3). The corruption appears
> to happen when unbinding a the one thermal zone that does register, I've
> not figured out exactly where.
>
> The memory corruption issue obviously needs to be dealt with properly
> (I'm still digging into it) but this does allow both platforms to boot
> reliably and seems like a sensible thing to do independently, ideally we
> could get this in as a fix.
> ---
> drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c index 195f3c5d0b38..b69134538867 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
> @@ -190,6 +190,9 @@ static irqreturn_t sun8i_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> int i;
>
> for_each_set_bit(i, &irq_bitmap, tmdev->chip->sensor_num) {
> + /* We allow some zones to not register. */
> + if (IS_ERR(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd))
> + continue;
> thermal_zone_device_update(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd,
>
THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
> }
> @@ -465,8 +468,17 @@ static int sun8i_ths_register(struct ths_device *tmdev)
> i,
>
&tmdev->sensor[i],
>
&ths_ops);
> - if (IS_ERR(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd))
> - return PTR_ERR(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd);
> +
> + /*
> + * If an individual zone fails to register for reasons
> + * other than probe deferral (eg, a bad DT) then carry
> + * on, other zones might register successfully.
> + */
> + if (IS_ERR(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd) == -
EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return PTR_ERR(tmdev-
>sensor[i].tzd);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(tmdev->dev, tmdev-
>sensor[i].tzd);
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: fdf0eaf11452d72945af31804e2a1048ee1b574c
> change-id: 20230718-thermal-sun8i-registration-df3a136ccafa
>
> Best regards,