Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_io: use a folio in sio_read_complete()

[zhangpeng (AS)]

On 2023/7/19 0:21, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 08:58:17PM +0800, zhangpeng (AS) wrote:
> > On 2023/7/17 21:40, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 09:25:58PM +0800, Peng Zhang wrote:
> > > > +++ b/mm/page_io.c
> > > > @@ -406,19 +406,19 @@ static void sio_read_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret)
> > > >    	if (ret == sio->len) {
> > > >    		for (p = 0; p < sio->pages; p++) {
> > > > -			struct page *page = sio->bvec[p].bv_page;
> > > > +			struct folio *folio = page_folio(sio->bvec[p].bv_page);
> > > > -			SetPageUptodate(page);
> > > > -			unlock_page(page);
> > > > +			folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> > > > +			folio_unlock(folio);
> > > >    		}
> > > I'm kind of shocked this works today.  Usually bvecs coalesce adjacent
> > > pages into a single entry, so you need to use a real iterator like
> > > bio_for_each_folio_all() to extract individual pages from a bvec.
> > > Maybe the sio bvec is constructed inefficiently.
> > >
> > > I think Kent had some bvec folio iterators in progress?
> > I'll convert bio_first_page_all() to bio_first_folio_all() in a v2.
> That isn't my point at all.  What I'm saying is that when you call a
> function like bio_add_folio(), if @folio is physically adjacent to the
> immediately prior folio already in the bio, it will extend the bv_len
> instead of adding the new folio to the bvec.  Maybe there's nothing like
> that for sio.

Thanks for your reply! I got it.

--
Best Regards,
Peng