Re: [PATCH rcu 2/6] rcu: Clarify rcu_is_watching() kernel-doc comment

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Tue Jul 18 2023 - 14:12:17 EST


On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 08:52:30AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 7/17/23 14:03, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Make it clear that this function always returns either true or false
> > without other planned failure modes.
> >
> > Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 1449cb69a0e0..fae9b4e29c93 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -679,10 +679,14 @@ static void rcu_disable_urgency_upon_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > /**
> > * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is not idle
>
> Would it be better to modify the 'not idle' to 'not idle from an RCU
> viewpoint'? This matches the comments in ct_nmi_enter() as well.

We have the "if RCU thinks that" earlier.

But maybe something like this?

* rcu_is_watching - RCU read-side critical sections permitted on current CPU?

> > *
> > - * Return true if RCU is watching the running CPU, which means that this
> > - * CPU can safely enter RCU read-side critical sections. In other words,
> > - * if the current CPU is not in its idle loop or is in an interrupt or
> > - * NMI handler, return true.
> > + * Return @true if RCU is watching the running CPU and @false otherwise.
> > + * An @true return means that this CPU can safely enter RCU read-side
> > + * critical sections.
> > + *
> > + * More specifically, if the current CPU is not deep within its idle
> > + * loop, return @true. Note that rcu_is_watching() will return @true if
> > + * invoked from an interrupt or NMI handler, even if that interrupt or
> > + * NMI interrupted the CPU while it was deep within its idle loop.
>
> But it is more than the idle loop, for ex. NOHZ_FULL CPUs with single task
> running could be idle from RCU's viewpoint? Could that be clarified more?

Perhaps something like this?

* Although calls to rcu_is_watching() from most parts of the kernel
* will return @true, there are important exceptions. For example, if the
* current CPU is deep within its idle loop, in kernel entry/exit code,
* or offline, rcu_is_watching() will return @false.

(Where nohz_full CPUs are covered by kernel entry/exit code.)

Thanx, Paul

> thanks,
>
> - Joel
>
>
> > *
> > * Make notrace because it can be called by the internal functions of
> > * ftrace, and making this notrace removes unnecessary recursion calls.
>