Re: [PATCH docs v2] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers

[Andrew Lunn]

> +Selecting the maintainer
> +========================
> +
> +The previous section described the expectations of the maintainer,
> +this section provides guidance on selecting one and decribes common

s/decribes/describes

> +Maintainers must be human, however, it is not acceptable to add a mailing
> +list or a group email as a maintainer.

I would probably replace however, with therefore. 

> +Removing an inactive maintainer should not be seen as a punitive action.
> +Having an inactive maintainer has a real cost as all developeres have

Too many e's in developeres

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>

    Andrew