Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/589] 6.1.39-rc3 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 20:07, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 02:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.39 release.
> > There are 589 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:14:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.39-rc3.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> As you know LKFT runs latest kselftests from stable 6.4 on
> stable rc 6.1 branches and found two test failures on this
> round of stable rc review 6.1.39-rc3 compared with 6.1.37.
>
> Test regressions:
>
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, kselftest-kvm
>   - kvm_get-reg-list
>
> * x86, kselftest-kvm
>   - kvm_vmx_pmu_caps_test

These two test failures are not kernel regressions.
However, these are due to latest kselftests on older kernels.

- Naresh