Re: [PATCH 22/35] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack()

[Szabolcs Nagy]

The 07/16/2023 22:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned long aligned_size;
> +	unsigned long __user *cap_ptr;
> +	unsigned long cap_val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!system_supports_gcs())
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (flags)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * An overflow would result in attempting to write the restore token
> +	 * to the wrong location. Not catastrophic, but just return the right
> +	 * error code and block it.
> +	 */
> +	aligned_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> +	if (aligned_size < size)
> +		return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> +	addr = alloc_gcs(addr, aligned_size, 0, false);
> +	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> +		return addr;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Put a cap token at the end of the allocated region so it
> +	 * can be switched to.
> +	 */
> +	cap_ptr = (unsigned long __user *)(addr + aligned_size -
> +					   (2 * sizeof(unsigned long)));
> +	cap_val = GCS_CAP(cap_ptr);
> +
> +	ret = copy_to_user_gcs(cap_ptr, &cap_val, 1);

with

  uint64_t *p = map_shadow_stack(0, N*8, 0);

i'd expect p[N-1] to be the end token and p[N-2] to be the cap token,
not p[PAGE_ALIGN(N*8)/8-2].

if we allow misalligned size here (and in munmap) then i think it's
better to not page align.  size%8!=0 || size<16 can be an error.


> +	if (ret != 0) {
> +		vm_munmap(addr, size);
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +
> +	return addr;
> +}