Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/tv: avoid possible division by zero

[Dan Carpenter]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:52:51PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17.07.2023 08:22, Su Hui wrote:
> > Clang warning: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c:
> > line 991, column 22 Division by zero.
> > Assuming tv_mode->oversample=1 and (!tv_mode->progressive)=1,
> > then division by zero will happen.
> > 
> > Fixes: 1bba5543e4fe ("drm/i915: Fix TV encoder clock computation")
> > Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c | 3 ++-
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
> > index 36b479b46b60..82b54af51f23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
> > @@ -988,7 +988,8 @@ intel_tv_mode_to_mode(struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> >   		      const struct tv_mode *tv_mode,
> >   		      int clock)
> >   {
> > -	mode->clock = clock / (tv_mode->oversample >> !tv_mode->progressive);
> > +	mode->clock = clock / (tv_mode->oversample != 1 ?
> > +			tv_mode->oversample >> !tv_mode->progressive : 1);
> 
> Seems too smart to me, why not just:
> mode->clock = clock / tv_mode->oversample;
> if (!tv_mode->progressive)
>     mode->clock <<= 1;

This is nice.

regards,
dan carpenter