Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/10] Introduce ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:00:59AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 07/13/2023 15:18, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> 
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> > 
> > Based on previous RFCs from Maxim Georgiev:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230502043150.17097-1-glipus@xxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > this series attempts to introduce new API for the hardware timestamping
> > control path (SIOCGHWTSTAMP and SIOCSHWTSTAMP handling).
> > 
> > I don't have any board with phylib hardware timestamping, so I would
> > appreciate testing (especially on lan966x, the most intricate
> > conversion). I was, however, able to test netdev level timestamping,
> > because I also have some more unsubmitted conversions in progress:
> > 
> > https://github.com/vladimiroltean/linux/commits/ndo-hwtstamp-v7
> 
> I have tested this patch series on lan966x. In both cases, when there is
> a PHY that supports HW timestamping and when the isn't a PHY that
> supports HW timestamping. In both cases it behaves as expected. Thanks!
> Tested-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for testing! I'll apply this tag to patches:

net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping
net: lan966x: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
net: remove phy_has_hwtstamp() -> phy_mii_ioctl() decision from converted drivers