Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] swiotlb: make io_tlb_default_mem local to swiotlb.c

[Petr Tesařík]

On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:06:07 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Petr,
> 
> On 13/7/23 17:23, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > From: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > SWIOTLB implementation details should not be exposed to the rest of the
> > kernel. This will allow to make changes to the implementation without
> > modifying non-swiotlb code.
> > 
> > To avoid breaking existing users, provide helper functions for the few
> > required fields.
> > 
> > As a bonus, using a helper function to initialize struct device allows to
> > get rid of an #ifdef in driver core.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/xen/mm.c          |  2 +-
> >   arch/mips/pci/pci-octeon.c |  2 +-
> >   arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c  |  2 +-
> >   drivers/base/core.c        |  4 +---
> >   drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c  |  2 +-
> >   include/linux/swiotlb.h    | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c       | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   7 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)  
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > index 4e52cd5e0bdc..07216af59e93 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ struct io_tlb_mem {
> >   	atomic_long_t used_hiwater;
> >   #endif
> >   };
> > -extern struct io_tlb_mem io_tlb_default_mem;
> >   
> >   static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> >   {
> > @@ -128,13 +127,22 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_force_bounce(struct device *dev)
> >   
> >   void swiotlb_init(bool addressing_limited, unsigned int flags);
> >   void __init swiotlb_exit(void);
> > +void swiotlb_dev_init(struct device *dev);
> >   size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev);
> > +bool is_swiotlb_allocated(void);
> >   bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev);
> >   void __init swiotlb_adjust_size(unsigned long size);
> > +phys_addr_t default_swiotlb_start(void);
> > +phys_addr_t default_swiotlb_limit(void);  
> 
> Usually we use start/end, base/limit, low[est]/high[est] tuples.

I'm no big fan of start/end, because the "end" sometimes means "highest
within range" and sometimes "one past range", being responsible for an
impressive amount of off-by-one errors.

But I agree. When I decided against "end", I should have also replaced
"start" with "base". Well, this patch series will certainly see a v5,
so I'll change it there. Thanks for the suggestion!

Petr T

> Possibly clearer to rename, regardless:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > index 2b83e3ad9dca..873b077d7e37 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c  
> 
> 
> > @@ -958,6 +975,26 @@ bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev)
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_swiotlb_active);
> >   
> > +/**
> > + * default_swiotlb_start() - get the start of the default SWIOTLB
> > + *
> > + * Get the lowest physical address used by the default software IO TLB pool.
> > + */
> > +phys_addr_t default_swiotlb_start(void)
> > +{
> > +	return io_tlb_default_mem.start;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * default_swiotlb_limit() - get the highest address in the default SWIOTLB
> > + *
> > + * Get the highest physical address used by the default software IO TLB pool.  
> 
> (note you describe lowest/highest).
> 
> > + */
> > +phys_addr_t default_swiotlb_limit(void)
> > +{
> > +	return io_tlb_default_mem.end - 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> >   
> >   static int io_tlb_used_get(void *data, u64 *val)  
>