Re: [PATCH 07/10] spi: rzv2m-csi: Switch to using {read,write}s{b,w}

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Jul 17 2023 - 05:40:17 EST


Hi Fabrizio,

On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 3:04 AM Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The RX/TX FIFOs implemented by the CSI IP are accessed by
> repeatedly reading/writing the same memory address, and
> therefore they are the ideal candidate for {read,write}s{b,w}.
> The RZ/V2M CSI driver currently implements loops to fill up
> the TX FIFO and empty the RX FIFO, differentiating between
> 8-bit and 16-bit word size.
> Switch to using {read,write}s{b,w} to get rid of the bespoke
> loops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rzv2m-csi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rzv2m-csi.c

> @@ -157,22 +157,15 @@ static int rzv2m_csi_start_stop_operation(const struct rzv2m_csi_priv *csi,
>
> static int rzv2m_csi_fill_txfifo(struct rzv2m_csi_priv *csi)
> {
> - int i;
> -
> if (readl(csi->base + CSI_OFIFOL))
> return -EIO;
>
> - if (csi->bytes_per_word == 2) {
> - u16 *buf = (u16 *)csi->txbuf;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < csi->words_to_transfer; i++)
> - writel(buf[i], csi->base + CSI_OFIFO);
> - } else {
> - u8 *buf = (u8 *)csi->txbuf;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < csi->words_to_transfer; i++)
> - writel(buf[i], csi->base + CSI_OFIFO);
> - }
> + if (csi->bytes_per_word == 2)
> + writesw(csi->base + CSI_OFIFO, csi->txbuf,
> + csi->words_to_transfer);
> + else
> + writesb(csi->base + CSI_OFIFO, csi->txbuf,
> + csi->words_to_transfer);

According to the hardware documentation[1], the access size for both the
CSI_OFIFO and CSI_IFIFO registers is 32 bits, so you must use writel()
resp. readl(). So please check with the hardware people first.

[1] RZ/V2M User's Manual Hardware, Rev. 1.30.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds