Re: [PATCH v1] gfs2: increase usage of folio_next_index() helper

From: Andreas Gruenbacher
Date: Mon Jul 17 2023 - 03:43:29 EST


Minjie,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:20 AM Minjie Du <duminjie@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Simplify code pattern of 'folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio)' by using
> the existing helper folio_next_index().
>
> Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/gfs2/aops.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/aops.c b/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> index ae49256b7..5f0254237 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> @@ -272,8 +272,7 @@ static int gfs2_write_jdata_batch(struct address_space *mapping,
> * not be suitable for data integrity
> * writeout).
> */
> - *done_index = folio->index +
> - folio_nr_pages(folio);
> + *done_index = folio_next_index(folio);
> ret = 1;
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.39.0
>

Applied, thanks.

Email addresses like '"open list:GFS2 FILE SYSTEM"
<cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>' and 'open list
<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' are not helpful though, so could you
please avoid using addresses like that in the future?

Thanks,
Andreas