Re: [PATCH RFC 04/11] rust: siphash: Add a simple siphash abstraction

[Gary Guo]

On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:13:56 +0900
Asahi Lina <lina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This simple wrapper allows Rust code to use the Hasher interface with
> the kernel siphash implementation. No fancy features supported for now,
> just basic bag-of-bytes hashing. No guarantee that hash outputs will
> remain stable in the future either.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |  1 +
>  rust/helpers.c                  |  8 ++++++++
>  rust/kernel/lib.rs              |  1 +
>  rust/kernel/siphash.rs          | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> index 3e601ce2548d..52f32e423b04 100644
> --- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> +++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/refcount.h>
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <linux/siphash.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  
>  /* `bindgen` gets confused at certain things. */
> diff --git a/rust/helpers.c b/rust/helpers.c
> index bb594da56137..1ed71315d1eb 100644
> --- a/rust/helpers.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/errname.h>
>  #include <linux/refcount.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/siphash.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
> @@ -135,6 +136,13 @@ void rust_helper_put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rust_helper_put_task_struct);
>  
> +u64 rust_helper_siphash(const void *data, size_t len,
> +			const siphash_key_t *key)
> +{
> +	return siphash(data, len, key);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rust_helper_siphash);
> +
>  /*
>   * We use `bindgen`'s `--size_t-is-usize` option to bind the C `size_t` type
>   * as the Rust `usize` type, so we can use it in contexts where Rust
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/lib.rs b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> index 85b261209977..8fb39078b85c 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  pub mod ioctl;
>  pub mod prelude;
>  pub mod print;
> +pub mod siphash;
>  mod static_assert;
>  #[doc(hidden)]
>  pub mod std_vendor;
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/siphash.rs b/rust/kernel/siphash.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e13a17cd5a93
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/siphash.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! A core::hash::Hasher wrapper for the kernel siphash implementation.
> +//!
> +//! This module allows Rust code to use the kernel's siphash implementation
> +//! to hash Rust objects.
> +
> +use core::hash::Hasher;
> +
> +/// A Hasher implementation that uses the kernel siphash implementation.
> +#[derive(Default)]
> +pub struct SipHasher {
> +    // SipHash state is 4xu64, but the Linux implementation
> +    // doesn't expose incremental hashing so let's just chain
> +    // individual SipHash calls for now, which return a u64
> +    // hash.

This is actually quite a big difference, which makes me think that this
hasher probably shouldn't be called `SipHasher`.

Actually, do we need a strong hash? Given that lock dep is only for
debugging purposes, I think we can use fnv, or even just fx hash?
They're all simple enough to be implemented in a couple of lines in
Rust and wouldn't need to call into FFI.

> +    state: u64,
> +}
> +
> +impl SipHasher {
> +    /// Create a new SipHasher with zeroed state.
> +    pub fn new() -> Self {
> +        SipHasher { state: 0 }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl Hasher for SipHasher {
> +    fn finish(&self) -> u64 {
> +        self.state
> +    }
> +
> +    fn write(&mut self, bytes: &[u8]) {
> +        let key = bindings::siphash_key_t {
> +            key: [self.state, 0],
> +        };
> +
> +        self.state = unsafe { bindings::siphash(bytes.as_ptr() as *const _, bytes.len(), &key) };
> +    }
> +}
>