Re: [PATCH v10 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Add set_dev_pasid callback for dma domain

From: Baolu Lu
Date: Thu Jul 13 2023 - 23:34:15 EST


On 2023/7/13 15:56, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 12:34 AM


- /*
- * Should never reach here until we add support for attaching
- * non-SVA domain to a pasid.
- */
- WARN_ON(1);
+ dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(curr, &dmar_domain->dev_pasids, link_domain)
{
+ if (curr->dev == dev && curr->pasid == pasid) {
+ list_del(&curr->link_domain);
+ dev_pasid = curr;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);


what about no matching dev_pasid is find?

kfree() can handle this gracefully.


+ domain_detach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
+ kfree(dev_pasid);
out_tear_down:
intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev, pasid, false);
intel_drain_pasid_prq(dev, pasid);
}

+static int intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
+{
+ struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
+ struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
+ struct dev_pasid_info *dev_pasid;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!pasid_supported(iommu) || dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (context_copied(iommu, info->bus, info->devfn))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ ret = prepare_domain_attach_device(domain, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ dev_pasid = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_pasid), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dev_pasid)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = domain_attach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_free;
+
+ if (domain_type_is_si(dmar_domain))
+ ret = intel_pasid_setup_pass_through(iommu, dmar_domain,
+ dev, pasid);
+ else if (dmar_domain->use_first_level)
+ ret = domain_setup_first_level(iommu, dmar_domain,
+ dev, pasid);
+ else
+ ret = intel_pasid_setup_second_level(iommu, dmar_domain,
+ dev, pasid);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_detach_iommu;
+
+ dev_pasid->dev = dev;
+ dev_pasid->pasid = pasid;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+ list_add(&dev_pasid->link_domain, &dmar_domain->dev_pasids);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+out_detach_iommu:
+ domain_detach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
+out_free:
+ kfree(dev_pasid);
+ return ret;
+}
+
const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
.capable = intel_iommu_capable,
.domain_alloc = intel_iommu_domain_alloc,
@@ -4777,6 +4869,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
#endif
.default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
.attach_dev = intel_iommu_attach_device,
+ .set_dev_pasid = intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid,
.map_pages = intel_iommu_map_pages,
.unmap_pages = intel_iommu_unmap_pages,
.iotlb_sync_map =
intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map,
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index 6d94a29f5d52..68bb7cdf5543 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ struct dmar_domain {

spinlock_t lock; /* Protect device tracking lists */
struct list_head devices; /* all devices' list */
+ struct list_head dev_pasids; /* all attached pasids */

struct dma_pte *pgd; /* virtual address */
int gaw; /* max guest address width */
@@ -717,6 +718,12 @@ struct device_domain_info {
struct pasid_table *pasid_table; /* pasid table */
};

+struct dev_pasid_info {
+ struct list_head link_domain; /* link to domain siblings */
+ struct device *dev; /* the physical device */
+ ioasid_t pasid; /* PASID of the physical device */
+};

the comment for dev/pasid is meaningless.

Then we can remove them.

Best regards,
baolu