Re: [PATCH v4 07/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Keep track of attached ssids

From: Nicolin Chen
Date: Thu Jul 13 2023 - 00:45:56 EST


On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 02:37:19PM +0800, Michael Shavit wrote:

> -int arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid,
> - unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> +/*
> + * If ssid is non-zero, issue atc invalidations with the given ssid instead of
> + * the one the domain is attached to. This is used by SVA since it's pasid
> + * attachments aren't recorded in smmu_domain yet.
> + */
> +int arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain_ssid(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid,
> + unsigned long iova, size_t size)
[..]
> @@ -1823,25 +1835,37 @@ int arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid,
> if (!atomic_read(&smmu_domain->nr_ats_masters))
> return 0;
>
> - arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(ssid, iova, size, &cmd);
> + arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(iova, size, &cmd);
>
> cmds.num = 0;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
> - list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->attached_domains_lock, flags);
> + list_for_each_entry(attached_domain, &smmu_domain->attached_domains,
> + domain_head) {
> + master = attached_domain->master;
> if (!master->ats_enabled)
> continue;
> + if (ssid != 0)
> + arm_smmu_atc_inv_cmd_set_ssid(ssid, &cmd);
> + else
> + arm_smmu_atc_inv_cmd_set_ssid(attached_domain->ssid, &cmd);
>
> for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; i++) {
> cmd.atc.sid = master->streams[i].id;
> arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add(smmu_domain->smmu, &cmds, &cmd);
> }
> }

And I don't quite get this part. Prior to this change, it issues
one ATC_INV command covering all ATC entries per comments inside
arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(). But now we replace that single command
with all attached subdomains in the list? Any reason for such a
change here?

Thanks
Nicolin