RE: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

[Christoph Niedermaier]

> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 11:21 AM
> To: DLG Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Christoph Niedermaier
> <cniedermaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Support Opensource <support.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Liam Girdwood
> <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>; Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; kernel <kernel@dh-
> electronics.com>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
> 
> ACHTUNG: Diese E-Mail wurde von Extern an Dich gesendet. Bitte klicke deshalb nicht auf
> Links in der E-Mail! Falls das Öffnen erforderlich ist, bitte Links zuvor auf
> Authentizität überprüfen – im Zweifelsfall bitte zuerst bei der IT nachfragen!
> 
> On 5/9/23 10:59, DLG Adam Ward wrote:
> > On 08 May 2023 00:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >>> It looks fine now; sorry I didn't notice before.
> >>
> >> I think a formal Reviewed-by / Acked-by would be nice.
> >
> > It's already there in the patch - obliquely referred to by "before", the apology because
> I'd missed that which the robot picked up on after I'd looked at it.
> 
> Ahh, in that case, sorry for the noise and thanks for the RB .
> 
> And for all its worth, patch is also:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>

I was wondering how to continue with this patch. Is there anything against
picking this patch or did I miss it?


Thanks and regards
Christoph