Re: [PATCH 3/4] selftests/nolibc: simplify status argument

[Willy Tarreau]

Hi Thomas,

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:48:41AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is an improvement over the previous patch.
> If so it should be squashed into it.

Indeed, I find it less readable, because when you read:

        result(llen, ret ? FAIL : OK);

it makes it explicit what values of ret are expected with what meaning,
but this one:

        result(llen, ret);

makes it quite opaque. I'd rather keep the ternary operator and the 3
values that are likely more accessible to newcomers who will more quickly
figure how to do what they need.

Thus I dropped this one and applied the 3 other ones which are indeed
a nice cleanup.

Thanks,
Willy