Re: [PATCH v2 33/92] cramfs: convert to ctime accessor functions

From: Jan Kara
Date: Thu Jul 06 2023 - 06:56:39 EST


On Wed 05-07-23 15:00:58, Jeff Layton wrote:
> In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
> used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> inode->i_ctime.
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Honza

> ---
> fs/cramfs/inode.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> index 27c6597aa1be..e755b2223936 100644
> --- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ static struct inode *get_cramfs_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> }
>
> /* Struct copy intentional */
> - inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = zerotime;
> + inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode,
> + zerotime);
> /* inode->i_nlink is left 1 - arguably wrong for directories,
> but it's the best we can do without reading the directory
> contents. 1 yields the right result in GNU find, even
> --
> 2.41.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR