Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/13] 6.1.38-rc2 review

[Daniel Díaz]

Hello!

On Tue, 04 Jul 2023 09:48:32 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.38 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jul 2023 08:46:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.38-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

## Build
* kernel: 6.1.38-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 185484ee4c4f93669a3a7b324d356d643fdbfe35
* git describe: v6.1.37-14-g185484ee4c4f
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.37-14-g185484ee4c4f

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.37)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.37)
No metric regressions found.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>


## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.37)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.37)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 171025, pass: 135962, fail: 2579, skip: 32314, xfail: 170

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 147 total, 146 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 53 total, 53 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 37 total, 36 passed, 1 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx


--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org