Re: [PATCH v9 06/10] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add support to read IRQ's related to multiport
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
Date: Sun Jul 02 2023 - 15:00:07 EST
On 6/27/2023 8:01 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:06:24AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
Add support to read Multiport IRQ's related to quad port controller
of SA8295 Device.
Please use a more descriptive summary and commit message; "read" is to
vague. You're looking up interrupts from the devicetree. Also this
should not just be about SA8295.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
index 3de43df6bbe8..3ab48a6925fe 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ struct dwc3_qcom {
struct reset_control *resets;
int hs_phy_irq;
- int dp_hs_phy_irq;
- int dm_hs_phy_irq;
- int ss_phy_irq;
+ int dp_hs_phy_irq[4];
+ int dm_hs_phy_irq[4];
+ int ss_phy_irq[2];
As has already been pointed out, you should use a define for these. And
you already have DWC3_MAX_PORTS.
The driver should not be hardcoding the fact that there are only two SS
ports on this particular SoC that you're interested in.
enum usb_device_speed usb2_speed;
struct extcon_dev *edev;
@@ -535,6 +535,80 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_get_irq(struct platform_device *pdev,
return ret;
}
+static int dwc3_qcom_setup_mp_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct dwc3_qcom *qcom = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ char irq_name[15];
+ int irq;
+ int ret;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
DWC3_MAX_PORTS here too and similar below.
+ if (qcom->dp_hs_phy_irq[i])
+ continue;
This is not very nice. You should try to integrate the current lookup
code as I told you to do with the PHY lookups. That is, use a single
loop for all HS/SS IRQs, and pick the legacy name if the number of ports
is 1.
Of course, you added the xhci capability parsing to the core driver so
that information is not yet available, but you need it in the glue
driver also...
As I mentioned earlier, you can infer the number of ports from the
interrupt names. Alternatively, you can infer it from the compatible
string. In any case, you should not need to ways to determine the same
information in the glue driver, then in the core part, and then yet
again in the xhci driver...
Hi Johan,
The reason why I didn't integrate this with the original function was
the ACPI stuff. The MP devices have no ACPI variant. And I think for
clarity sake its best to keep these two functions separated.
Regards,
Krishna,
+
+ sprintf(irq_name, "dp%d_hs_phy_irq", i+1);
Spaces around binary operators. Does not checkpatch warn about that?
+ irq = dwc3_qcom_get_irq(pdev, irq_name, -1);
+ if (irq > 0) {
+ irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(qcom->dev, irq, NULL,
+ qcom_dwc3_resume_irq,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ irq_name, qcom);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qcom->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", irq_name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ qcom->dp_hs_phy_irq[i] = irq;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ if (qcom->dm_hs_phy_irq[i])
+ continue;
+
+ sprintf(irq_name, "dm%d_hs_phy_irq", i+1);
+ irq = dwc3_qcom_get_irq(pdev, irq_name, -1);
+ if (irq > 0) {
+ irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(qcom->dev, irq, NULL,
+ qcom_dwc3_resume_irq,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ irq_name, qcom);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qcom->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", irq_name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ qcom->dm_hs_phy_irq[i] = irq;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ if (qcom->ss_phy_irq[i])
+ continue;
+
+ sprintf(irq_name, "ss%d_phy_irq", i+1);
+ irq = dwc3_qcom_get_irq(pdev, irq_name, -1);
+ if (irq > 0) {
+ irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(qcom->dev, irq, NULL,
+ qcom_dwc3_resume_irq,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ irq_name, qcom);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qcom->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", irq_name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ qcom->ss_phy_irq[i] = irq;
+ }
So the above should all be merged in either a single helper looking up
all the interrupts for a port and resused for the non-MP case.
I agree, Will merge all under some common helper function.
Thanks,
Krishna,
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int dwc3_qcom_setup_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct dwc3_qcom *qcom = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -570,7 +644,7 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_setup_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(qcom->dev, "dp_hs_phy_irq failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
- qcom->dp_hs_phy_irq = irq;
+ qcom->dp_hs_phy_irq[0] = irq;
}
irq = dwc3_qcom_get_irq(pdev, "dm_hs_phy_irq",
@@ -585,7 +659,7 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_setup_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(qcom->dev, "dm_hs_phy_irq failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
- qcom->dm_hs_phy_irq = irq;
+ qcom->dm_hs_phy_irq[0] = irq;
}
irq = dwc3_qcom_get_irq(pdev, "ss_phy_irq",
@@ -600,10 +674,10 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_setup_irq(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(qcom->dev, "ss_phy_irq failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
- qcom->ss_phy_irq = irq;
+ qcom->ss_phy_irq[0] = irq;
}
- return 0;
+ return dwc3_qcom_setup_mp_irq(pdev);;
Stray ;
}
static int dwc3_qcom_clk_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom, int count)
Johan