Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] allow run with minimal kernel config

From: Zhangjin Wu
Date: Fri Jun 30 2023 - 08:05:50 EST


Hi, Thomas

> On 2023-06-30 07:22:39+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > Willy, Thomas
> >
> > This is v2 to allow run with minimal kernel config, see v1 [1].
> >
> > It mainly applied the suggestions from Thomas. It is based on our
> > previous v5 sysret helper series [2] and Thomas' chmod_net removal
> > patchset [3].
> >
> > Now, a test report on arm/vexpress-a9 without procfs, shmem, tmpfs, net
> > and memfd_create looks like:
> >
> > LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9:
> >
> > 14 chmod_net [SKIPPED]
>
> Shouldn't this be gone?
>

Yes, if apply your chmod_net removal patches before this series:

LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9:

14 chmod_self [SKIPPED]
16 chown_self [SKIPPED]
40 link_cross [SKIPPED]
0 -fstackprotector not supported [SKIPPED]

139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed.
See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log

LOG: testing summary:

arch/board | result
------------|------------
arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log

This test also applied the new proposed chroot_exe and chmod_tmpfile
from https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230630111433.211130-1-falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx/

> > 15 chmod_self [SKIPPED]
> > 17 chown_self [SKIPPED]
> > 41 link_cross [SKIPPED]
> > 0 -fstackprotector not supported [SKIPPED]
> >
> > 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed.
> > See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log
> >
> > LOG: testing summary:
> >
> > arch/board | result
> > ------------|------------
> > arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log
>
> > [..]
>
> > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 22 ++++
> > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 102 +++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> A few nitpicks left, mentioned on the patches themselves.
>
> In general: for the full series.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Thanks Thomas, will send v3 later.

Best regards,
Zhangjin