Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Add PEBS test for MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES

[Jinrong Liang]

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2023年6月29日周四 05:55写道：
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023, Jinrong Liang wrote:
> > From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This commit adds a PEBS test that verifies all possible combinations
> > of PEBS-related bits in MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES. This comprehensive
> > test ensures the accuracy of the PEBS feature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c  | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
> > index 02903084598f..c1b1ba44bc26 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@
> >
> >  #define MAX_LINEAR_ADDR_MASK         GENMASK_ULL(15, 8)
> >  #define ADDR_OFS_BIT                 8
> > +#define PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT              0x3f
> > +#define PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE           BIT_ULL(12)
> > +#define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES            BIT_ULL(13)
> > +#define PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE       BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_METRICS_IDX)
> > +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL BIT_ULL(PERF_CAP_PT_IDX)
> > +#define PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL             (PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK | PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL)
> >
> >  union perf_capabilities {
> >       struct {
> > @@ -331,6 +337,70 @@ static void test_ds_area_noncanonical_address(union perf_capabilities host_cap)
> >       kvm_vm_free(vm);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void test_pebs_bit_combinations(union perf_capabilities host_cap)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
>
> Reverse xmas tree.
>
> > +     uint64_t pebs_val, val;
> > +     struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> > +     struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, NULL);
>
> It's kinda silly, but I think it makes sense to wait until after all of the
> TEST_REQUIRE()s to create the VM+vCPU.
>
> > +
> > +     TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION) > 1);
> > +     TEST_REQUIRE(host_cap.capabilities & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT);
> > +     TEST_REQUIRE(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE) &
> > +                  MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_PEBS_UNAVAIL);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Test if PEBS_REC_FMT is set and the value is the same as host,
> > +      * the other PEBS bits are allowed to be set only if they are the
> > +      * same as host.
> > +      */
> > +     pebs_val = host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL;
> > +
> > +     vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, pebs_val);
> > +     ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES),
> > +               (u64)pebs_val);
>
> This cast shouldn't be necessary.  And if you're going to split lines...
>
>         ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES),
>                   host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL);
>
> Though isn't that flawed?  E.g. will fail if MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES has
> non-PEBS bits set.  I think what you want is something like:
>
>         guest_perf_caps = vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES);
>
>         ASSERT_EQ(guest_perf_caps & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL,
>                   host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL);
>
> > +
> > +     /* Test all PEBS bit combinations. */
> > +     for (val = 0x0; val <= (~0ul & PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL); val++) {
> > +             /* Skips values that are not related to PEBS. */
> > +             if (val & (PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT | PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE |
> > +                 PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES | PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE))
>
> Align things by their scope, i.e.
>
>                 if (val & (PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT | PMU_CAP_SMM_FREEZE
>                            PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES | PMU_CAP_PERF_METRICS_AVAILABLE))
>
> But even better would be to look for !PEBS, not some other values where it's not
> clear they exhaustively cover all !PEBS value.  E.g. can't this be?
>
>                 if (val & ~PMU_CAP_PEBS_ALL)
>                         continue;
>
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when the KVM doesn't
>
> Just "KVM", not "the KVM".
>
> > +              * supports Intel PT.
> > +              */
> > +             if ((val & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL) &&
> > +                 (!(host_cap.capabilities & PMU_CAP_PEBS_OUTPUT_PT_AVAIL))) {
> > +                     ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val);
> > +                     TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val);
> > +
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * Test that value of PEBS is rejected when carrying
>
> I don't quite follow what you mean by "carrying".  Do you mean a non-zero value?

I apologize for the confusion. Yes, by "carrying" I meant a non-zero
value. I will revise the comment to clarify the meaning and make it
more precise.

>
> > +              * PEBS_REC_FMT if the value of PEBS is not equal to host.
> > +              */
> > +             if ((val & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT) && val != pebs_val) {
> > +                     ret = _vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val);
> > +                     TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "Bad PEBS auxiliary bits = 0x%lx didn't fail", val);
> > +
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * Test that PEBS bits can be written simultaneously or
> > +              * independently if PEBS_REC_FMT is not carried.
> > +              */
> > +             vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val);
> > +             ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES), val);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     kvm_vm_free(vm);
> > +}

Thank you for all your valuable feedback and suggestions. Your
guidance has been extremely helpful in improving the quality of the
code.