Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config fragments for test runs

[James Clark]

On 29/06/2023 23:03, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:53 AM James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Changes since RFC:
>>
>>  * Changed arch filename convention to use the ARCH= build time values
>>    instead of uname
>>
>> It seems like there were no objections on the RFC, apart from maybe
>> changing the perf tests to run as a kself test. But that's probably not
>> going to happen for a while, if ever, and these fragments can always
>> be moved in that case.
> 
> I missed the RFC, sorry.  Could you please add a link for that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung

Yep, it's here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d02cce4a-47b1-a776-0d3a-a6a7c9a4d8fd@xxxxxxx/T/

> 
> 
>>
>> James Clark (1):
>>   perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config fragments for test runs
>>
>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README |  7 +++++++
>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64  |  1 +
>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config | 11 +++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README
>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64
>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config
>>
>>
>> base-commit: ad5f604e186ac08d12c401e34ea96c09c38ddbc5
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>