Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] ublk: change ublk IO command defines to enum

From: Damien Le Moal
Date: Wed Jun 28 2023 - 18:51:31 EST


On 6/29/23 04:06, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This change is in preparation for zoned storage support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> index 4b8558db90e1..471b3b983045 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> @@ -229,12 +229,23 @@ struct ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info {
> __u64 reserved2;
> };
>
> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_READ 0
> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE 1
> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_FLUSH 2
> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_DISCARD 3
> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_SAME 4
> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_ZEROES 5
> +enum ublk_op {
> + UBLK_IO_OP_READ = 0,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE = 1,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_FLUSH = 2,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_DISCARD = 3,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_SAME = 4,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_ZEROES = 5,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_OPEN = 10,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_CLOSE = 11,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_FINISH = 12,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_APPEND = 13,
> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_RESET = 15,
> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN_START = 32,
> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN_END = 96,
> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_OUT_START = __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN_END,
> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_OUT_END = 160,
> +};

This patch does not do what the title says. You are also introducing the zone
operations, and the very obscure __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_XXX operations without an
explanation. Also, why the "__" prefix for these ? I do not see the point...
Given that this is a uapi, a comment to explain the less obvious commands would
be nice.

So I think the change to an enum for the existing ops can be done either in
patch 2 or as a separate patch and the introduction of the zone operations done
in patch 3 or as a separate patch.

>
> #define UBLK_IO_F_FAILFAST_DEV (1U << 8)
> #define UBLK_IO_F_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT (1U << 9)

--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research