RE: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

[Kubalewski, Arkadiusz]

>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 12:18 PM
>
>Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 02:38:10PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>v8 -> v9:
>
>Could you please address all the unresolved issues from v8 and send v10?
>I'm not reviewing this one.
>
>Thanks!

Sure, will do, but first missing to-do/discuss list:
1) remove mode_set as not used by any driver
2) remove "no-added-value" static functions descriptions in
   dpll_core/dpll_netlink
3) merge patches [ 03/10, 04/10, 05/10 ] into patches that are compiling
   after each patch apply
4) remove function return values descriptions/lists
5) Fix patch [05/10]:
   - status Supported
   - additional maintainers
   - remove callback:
     int (*source_pin_idx_get)(...) from `struct dpll_device_ops`
6) Fix patch [08/10]: rethink ice mutex locking scheme
7) Fix patch [09/10]: multiple comments on
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZIQu+%2Fo4J0ZBspVg@nanopsycho/#t
8) add PPS DPLL phase offset to the netlink get-device API

Thank you!
Arkadiusz