Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf report: Don't add to histogram when there is no thread found

[Ian Rogers]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:58 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:43 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:02 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 05:10:58PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > > > thread__find_map() chooses to exit without assigning a thread to the
> > > > addr_location in some scenarios, for example when there are samples from
> > > > a guest and perf_guest == false. This results in a segfault when adding
> > > > to the histogram because it uses unguarded accesses to the thread member
> > > > of the addr_location.
> > >
> > > Looking at the commit 0dd5041c9a0ea ("perf addr_location: Add
> > > init/exit/copy functions") that introduced the change, I'm not sure if
> > > it's the intend behavior.
> > >
> > > It might change maps and map, but not thread.  Then I think no reason
> > > to not set the al->thread at the beginning.
> > >
> > > How about this?  Ian?
> > > (I guess we can get rid of the duplicate 'al->map = NULL' part)
> >
> > It seemed strange that we were failing to find a map (the function's
> > purpose) but then populating the address_location. The change below
> > brings back that somewhat odd behavior. I'm okay with reverting to the
> > old behavior, clearly there were users relying on it. We should
> > probably also copy maps and not just thread, as that was the previous
> > behavior.
>
> Probably.  But it used to support samples without maps and I think
> that's why it ignores the return value of thread__find_map().  So
> we can expect al.map is NULL and maybe fine to leave it for now.
>
> As machine__resolve() returns -1 if it gets no thread, we should set
> al.thread when it returns 0.
>
> Can I get your Acked-by?

Yep:
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Ian

> Thanks,
> Namhyung