Re: [PATCH v12 05/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL infrastructure

[kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:28:20AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > Or is that wrapper only used for never-fail SEAMCALLs? If so, please
> > document it.
> > 
> 
> How about adding below?
> 
> 	Use __seamcall() directly in cases that printing error message isn't
> 	desired, e.g., when SEAMCALL can legally fail with BUSY and the caller
> 	wants to retry.
> 

Looks good to me.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov