Re: [RFC PATCH v4 06/17] vsock: check error queue to set EPOLLERR

From: Stefano Garzarella
Date: Tue Jun 27 2023 - 03:54:32 EST


On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 07:44:25AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:


On 26.06.2023 19:04, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 11:49:28PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
If socket's error queue is not empty, EPOLLERR must be set. Otherwise,
reader of error queue won't detect data in it using EPOLLERR bit.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

This patch looks like it can go even without this series.

Is it a fix? Should we add a fixes tag?

Yes, it is fix and I can exclude it from this set to reduce number
of patches, but there is no reproducer for this without MSG_ZEROCOPY
support - at this moment this feature is the only user of error queue
for AF_VSOCK.

Okay, so it's fine to keep it here, but please mention in the comment that without MSG_ZEROCOPY it can't be reproduced.

That way we know that we don't have to backport into the stable branches.

Thanks,
Stefano


Thanks, Arseniy


Thanks,
Stefano


diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index efb8a0937a13..45fd20c4ed50 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
    poll_wait(file, sk_sleep(sk), wait);
    mask = 0;

-    if (sk->sk_err)
+    if (sk->sk_err || !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_error_queue))
        /* Signify that there has been an error on this socket. */
        mask |= EPOLLERR;

-- 
2.25.1