Re: [PATCH] mm: memory-failure: remove unneeded page state check in shake_page()

From: Miaohe Lin
Date: Sun Jun 25 2023 - 21:43:56 EST


On 2023/6/26 8:52, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 07:34:30PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> Remove unneeded PageLRU(p) and is_free_buddy_page(p) check as slab caches
>> are not shrunk now. This check can be added back when a lightweight range
>> based shrinker is available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This looks to me a good cleanup because the result of
> "if (PageLRU(p) || is_free_buddy_page(p))" check is not used, so the check
> itself is unneeded.
>
>> ---
>> mm/memory-failure.c | 9 ++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index 5b663eca1f29..92f951df3e87 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -373,11 +373,10 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p)
>> if (PageHuge(p))
>> return;
>>
>> - if (!PageSlab(p)) {
>> - lru_add_drain_all();
>> - if (PageLRU(p) || is_free_buddy_page(p))
>> - return;
>> - }
>> + if (PageSlab(p))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + lru_add_drain_all();
>>
>> /*
>> * TODO: Could shrink slab caches here if a lightweight range-based
>
> I think that this TODO comment can be put together with "if (PageSlab)" block.

Thanks for your comment and advice. Do you mean something like below?

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 5b663eca1f29..66e7b3ceaf2d 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -372,17 +372,14 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p)
{
if (PageHuge(p))
return;
-
- if (!PageSlab(p)) {
- lru_add_drain_all();
- if (PageLRU(p) || is_free_buddy_page(p))
- return;
- }
-
/*
* TODO: Could shrink slab caches here if a lightweight range-based
* shrinker will be available.
*/
+ if (PageSlab(p))
+ return;
+
+ lru_add_drain_all();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shake_page);

Thanks.