Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: remove unneeded do while loop in cpu_attach_domain()

From: Miaohe Lin
Date: Sat Jun 24 2023 - 22:04:38 EST


On 2023/6/22 2:57, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 06:11:59AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:53:57AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> On 2023/6/20 22:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 04:19:26PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>> When sg != sd->groups, the do while loop would cause deadloop here. But
>>>>> that won't occur because sg is always equal to sd->groups now. Remove
>>>>> this unneeded do while loop.
>>>>
>>>> This Changelog makes no sense to me.. Yes, as is the do {} while loop is
>>>> dead code, but it *should* have read like:
>>>>
>>>> do {
>>>> sg->flags = 0;
>>>> sg = sg->next;
>>>> } while (sg != sd->groups);
>>
>> Yes, I agree that this is the correct solution.
>
> I take this back. I think we should do this:
>
> @@ -758,19 +758,14 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
> sd = sd->parent;
> destroy_sched_domain(tmp);
> if (sd) {
> - struct sched_group *sg = sd->groups;
> -
> /*
> * sched groups hold the flags of the child sched
> * domain for convenience. Clear such flags since
> * the child is being destroyed.
> */
> - do {
> - sg->flags = 0;
> - } while (sg != sd->groups);
> + sd->groups->flags = 0;
>
> sd->child = NULL;
> - }
> }
>
> sched_domain_debug(sd, cpu);
>
> A comment from Chenyu made got me thinking that we should only clear the
> flags of the local group as viewed from the parent domain. This is because
> the domain being degenerated defines the flags of such group only.

This looks better to my patch. Thanks.