Re: [PATCH 23/39] drm: renesas: shmobile: Move interface handling to connector setup

[Laurent Pinchart]

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 07:51:07PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 6:39 PM Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Move legacy interface handling to the connector setup code.
> > > Set up bus_flags and bus_formats in display_info according to the
> > > bus format and panel information from platform data, to make it more
> > > similar with DT-based connector/bridge/panel setup.
> > > This will allows us to use the same LCD interface setup code for both
> >
> > s/allows/allow/
> >
> > > legacy and DT-based systems.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/shmobile/shmob_drm_crtc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/shmobile/shmob_drm_crtc.c
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > >   */
> > >
> > >  #include <linux/clk.h>
> > > +#include <linux/media-bus-format.h>
> > >  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > >
> > >  #include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
> > > @@ -66,15 +67,65 @@ static void shmob_drm_crtc_setup_geometry(struct shmob_drm_crtc *scrtc)
> > >  {
> > >       struct drm_crtc *crtc = &scrtc->crtc;
> > >       struct shmob_drm_device *sdev = to_shmob_device(crtc->dev);
> > > -     enum display_flags dpy_flags = sdev->connector.mode->flags;
> > > +     const struct drm_display_info *info = &sdev->connector->display_info;
> > >       const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc->mode;
> > >       u32 value;
> > >
> > > -     value = sdev->ldmt1r
> > > -           | ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC) ? 0 : LDMT1R_VPOL)
> > > -           | ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC) ? 0 : LDMT1R_HPOL)
> > > -           | ((dpy_flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_POSEDGE) ? LDMT1R_DWPOL : 0)
> > > -           | ((dpy_flags & DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_LOW) ? LDMT1R_DIPOL : 0);
> > > +     if (!info->num_bus_formats || !info->bus_formats) {
> > > +             dev_warn(sdev->dev, "No bus format reported, using RGB888\n");
> > > +             value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB24;
> > > +     } else {
> > > +             switch (info->bus_formats[0]) {
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_3X8:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB8;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_2X9_BE:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB9;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_BE:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB12A;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB444_1X12:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB12B;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_1X16:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB16;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X18:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB18;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB24;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_1X16:
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_YCBCR;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +
> > > +             default:
> > > +                     dev_warn(sdev->dev,
> > > +                              "unsupported bus format 0x%x, using RGB888\n",
> > > +                              info->bus_formats[0]);
> > > +                     value = LDMT1R_MIFTYP_RGB24;
> > > +                     break;
> > > +             }
> >
> > It's a bit annoying to lose the ability to validate the bus format at
> > probe time. Can it be kept. I'm also OK with restoring it later in the
> > series if it gets in the way of the conversion, in which case a mention
> > in the commit message would be nice.
> 
> I guess I can keep it, somewhere.
> Probably it should be validated for the DT case later, too.
> BTW, drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.s doesn't check this
> either, so I copied the bad example from the expert ;-)

There's an endless amount of issues to fix. Patches are of course
welcome :-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart