Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Add io_uring command support for sockets

[Breno Leitao]

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:39:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 19:03:04 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Correct. For now we are just using 0xa0 and 0xa1, and eventually we
> > > might need more ioctls numbers.
> > > 
> > > I got these numbers finding a unused block and having some room for
> > > expansion, as suggested by Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst,
> > > that says:
> > > 
> > > 	If you are writing a driver for a new device and need a letter, pick an
> > > 	unused block with enough room for expansion: 32 to 256 ioctl commands.  
> > 
> > So is this the first io_uring ioctl?  If so, why is this an ioctl and
> > not just a "normal" io_uring call?
> 
> +1, the mixing with classic ioctl seems confusing and I'm not sure 
> if it buys us anything.

Sure, let me remove the dependency on ioctl()s then.