Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing ptep in kvm_mmu_page

From: Huang, Kai
Date: Thu Jun 22 2023 - 04:32:25 EST


On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 00:08 +0000, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> Add the missing ptep in kvm_mmu_page description. ptep is used when TDP MMU
> is enabled and it shares the storage with parent_ptes. Update the doc to
> help readers to get up-to-date info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> index 149dd3cba48f..36bfe0fe02bb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> @@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ Shadow pages contain the following information:
> parent_ptes points at this single spte, otherwise, there exists multiple
> sptes pointing at this page and (parent_ptes & ~0x1) points at a data
> structure with a list of parent sptes.
> + ptep:
> + Pointer to the parent spte when TDP MMU is enabled. 
>

IMHO "parent spte" alone _may_ be confusing. I think it's better to explicitly
mention "pointing to this page" similar to the "parent_ptes" above.

Also, I think "when TDP MMU is enabled" isn't strictly true, depending on what
does "when TDP MMU is enabled mean". E.g., when tdp_mmu_enabled module
parameter is true, we can still have a nested EPT shadow page from L2 which
won't use this either IIUC.

> In TDP MMU, each
> + shadow page will have at most one parent. Note that this field is a
> + union with parent_ptes.

Also, perhaps "have at most one parent" can be more precise: only root page has
no parent, while other non-root pages always have one parent SPTE pointing to
each of them.