Re: A question about prefetchw detection in "x86/asm: Cleanup prefetch primitives"

From: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Wed Jun 21 2023 - 09:47:42 EST


On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:46 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:19:34PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:09 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:06:51PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > I think it's not an issue in the kernel itself, but announcing
> > > > 3dnowprefetch in /proc/cpuinfo for an old Intel CPU w/o real
> > > > prefetchw
> > > > implementation seems problematic (to me).
> > >
> > > And this is a problem because?
> >
> > If a code generator parses /proc/cpuinfo for CPU capabilities, it
> > may
> > generates a no-op prefetchw instead of prefetcht0 as a fallback.
>
> Err, go back.
>
> That code snippet you pasted, did you see where that comes from?
>
> A function called init_amd().
>
> Now, is Intel hardware and SDM PREFETCHW text at all relevant here?

Oh s**t, I'm completely stupid :(.

--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University