Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf/btf: Accept function names that contain dots

From: Yonghong Song
Date: Tue Jun 20 2023 - 10:54:07 EST




On 6/20/23 7:38 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 2:17 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

How many people really build the kernel with
LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=0
which uses clang compiler ans gcc 'as'.
I think distro most likely won't do this if they intend to
build the kernel with clang.

Note that
LLVM=1
implies to use both clang compiler and clang assembler.

Yes, we prefer folks to build with LLVM=1. The problem exists for
users of stable kernels that predate LLVM_IAS=1 support working well
(4.19 is when we had most of the assembler related issues sorted out,
actually later but we backported most fixes to 4.19).


Using clang17 and 'LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=0', with latest bpf-next,
I actually hit some build errors like:

/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:4: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'

Probably because:
1. CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5=y was set or
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y and you're using a version
of clang which implicitly defaults to DWARFv5.
2. you're using a version of GAS that does not understand DWARFv5.
3. you did not run defconfig/menuconfig to have kconfig check for
DWARFv5 support.

Yes, I am using llvm17 which I think the default dwarf is v5, and
indeed I have
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y

My gas is 2.30, probably too old to support dwarf 5.

Yes, I didn't run defconfig/menuconfig.


The kconfigs should prevent you from selecting DWARFv5 if your
toolchain combination doesn't support it; if you run kconfig.

/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:4: Error: file number less than one
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:5: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:8: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:9: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:10: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
/tmp/video-bios-59fa52.s:68: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
clang: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)
make[4]: *** [/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/scripts/Makefile.build:252:
arch/x86/realmode/rm/video-bios.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:4: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `"'
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:4: Error: file number less than one
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:5: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `"'
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `"'
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `"'
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:8: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `"'
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:81: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
/tmp/wakemain-88777c.s:312: Error: junk at end of line, first
unrecognized character is `"'
clang: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)

Potentially because of my local gnu assembler 2.30-120.el8 won't work

It's recorded in lib/Kconfig.debug that 2.35.2 is required for DWARFv5
support if you're using GAS. My machine has 2.40.

with some syntax generated by clang. Mixing clang compiler and arbitrary
gnu assembler are not a good idea (see the above example). It might

I agree, but for older branches of stable which are still supported,
we didn't quite have clang assembler support usable. We still need to
support those branches of stable.

Thanks Florent pointing out 5.10 stable kernels which have this issue.
I am okay with backporting to old stable kernels if that is needed.
But the patch going to bpf-next should not have a bug-fix tag and
the patch commit message can be tweaked for backport to 5.10 though.


work with close-to-latest gnu assembler.

To support function name like '<fname>.isra', some llvm work will be
needed, and it may take some time.

So in my opinion, this patch is NOT a bug fix. It won't affect distro.
Whether we should backport to the old kernel, I am not sure whether it
is absolutely necessary as casual build can always remove LLVM_IAS=0 or
hack the kernel source itself.