RE: [PATCH v8 01/33] x86/traps: let common_interrupt() handle IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, Jun 19 2023 at 08:00, Li, Xin3 wrote:
> To me it's better to keep the changes in one patch, thus the differences
> are more obvious.

The rename to vector_schedule_cleanup() can be obviously done first.

> We need a second patch to do vector cleanup in lapic_offline() in case the
> vector cleanup timer has not expired.

Right. I was lazy and just put a WARN_ON() there under the assumption
that you will figure it out.

But a second patch?

We don't switch things over into a broken state first and then fix it up
afterwards.

Thanks,

        tglx