Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] ext4: No need to check return value of block_commit_write()

From: Jan Kara
Date: Mon Jun 19 2023 - 05:56:24 EST


On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:48, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Remove unnecessary check on the return value of block_commit_write().
>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Honza

> ---
> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> index b5af2fc03b2f..f4b4861a74ee 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> @@ -392,14 +392,11 @@ move_extent_per_page(struct file *o_filp, struct inode *donor_inode,
> for (i = 0; i < block_len_in_page; i++) {
> *err = ext4_get_block(orig_inode, orig_blk_offset + i, bh, 0);
> if (*err < 0)
> - break;
> + goto repair_branches;
> bh = bh->b_this_page;
> }
> - if (!*err)
> - *err = block_commit_write(&folio[0]->page, from, from + replaced_size);
>
> - if (unlikely(*err < 0))
> - goto repair_branches;
> + block_commit_write(&folio[0]->page, from, from + replaced_size);
>
> /* Even in case of data=writeback it is reasonable to pin
> * inode to transaction, to prevent unexpected data loss */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR