Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: phy: realtek: Add the doc about the Realtek SoC USB 2.0 PHY

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sat Jun 17 2023 - 04:23:04 EST


On 14/06/2023 11:28, Stanley Chang wrote:
> Add the documentation explain the property about Realtek USB PHY driver.
>
> Realtek DHC (digital home center) RTD SoCs support DWC3 XHCI USB
> controller. Added the driver to drive the USB 2.0 PHY transceivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3 to v4 change:
> 1. Remove the parameter and non hardware properties from dts.
> 2. Using the compatible data included the config and parameter
> in driver.
> v2 to v3 change:
> 1. Broken down into two patches, one for each of USB 2 & 3.
> 2. Add more description about Realtek RTD SoCs architecture.
> 3. Removed parameter v1 support for simplification.
> 4. Revised the compatible name for fallback compatible.
> 5. Remove some properties that can be set in the driver.
> v1 to v2 change:
> Add phy-cells for generic phy driver
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml | 145 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cfd77143475c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +# Copyright 2023 Realtek Semiconductor Corporation
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Realtek DHC SoCs USB 2.0 PHY
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> + Realtek USB 2.0 PHY support the digital home center (DHC) RTD series SoCs.
> + The USB 2.0 PHY driver is designed to support the XHCI controller. The SoCs
> + support multiple XHCI controllers. One PHY device node maps to one XHCI
> + controller.
> +
> + RTD1295/RTD1619 SoCs USB
> + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers.
> + Each XHCI maps to one USB 2.0 PHY and map one USB 3.0 PHY on some
> + controllers.
> + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + |- usb3phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + |- usb3phy -- phy#0
> +
> + RTD1395 SoCs USB
> + The USB architecture includes two XHCI controllers.
> + The controller#0 has one USB 2.0 PHY. The controller#1 includes two USB 2.0
> + PHY.
> + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + |- phy#1
> +
> + RTD1319/RTD1619b SoCs USB
> + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers.
> + Each XHCI maps to one USB 2.0 PHY and map one USB 3.0 PHY on controllers#2.
> + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + |- usb3phy -- phy#0
> +
> + RTD1319d SoCs USB
> + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers.
> + Each xhci maps to one USB 2.0 PHY and map one USB 3.0 PHY on controllers#0.
> + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + |- usb3phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> +
> + RTD1312c/RTD1315e SoCs USB
> + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers.
> + Each XHCI maps to one USB 2.0 PHY.
> + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - realtek,rtd1295-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1312c-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1315e-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1319-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1319d-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1395-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1395-usb2phy-2port
> + - realtek,rtd1619-usb2phy
> + - realtek,rtd1619b-usb2phy
> + - const: realtek,usb2phy

That's not what your driver is saying... This patchset has random set of
changes.

I suggest to drop "realtek,usb2phy".

> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: PHY data registers
> + - description: PHY control registers
> +
> + "#phy-cells":
> + const: 0
> +
> + nvmem-cells:
> + maxItems: 2
> + description:
> + Phandles to nvmem cell that contains the trimming data.
> + If unspecified, default value is used.
> +
> + nvmem-cell-names:
> + items:
> + - const: usb-dc-cal
> + - const: usb-dc-dis
> + description:
> + The following names, which correspond to each nvmem-cells.
> + usb-dc-cal is the driving level for each phy specified via efuse.
> + usb-dc-dis is the disconnection level for each phy specified via efuse.
> +
> + realtek,inverse-hstx-sync-clock:
> + description:
> + For one of the phys of RTD1619b SoC, the synchronous clock of the
> + high-speed tx must be inverted. So this property is used to set the
> + inverted clock.

Drop last sentence, it is redundant.

> + type: boolean
> +
> + realtek,driving-level:
> + description:
> + Each board or port may have a different driving capability. This
> + will adjust the driving level value if the value is not the default.

I don't understand it. What is "driving capability" and if each port can
have it different, why do you need property for this?

You mention some default - why it is not expressed as "default: xx"?

What do the values mean?

> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + minimum: 0
> + maximum: 31
> +
> + realtek,driving-compensate:
> + description:
> + For RTD1315e SoC, the driving level can be adjusted by reading the
> + efuse table. Therefore, this property provides drive compensation for
> + different boards with different drive capabilities.

if driving level can be read from nvmem, why do you have
realtek,driving-level in the first place? Don't you miss here some allOf
making this constrained per variant?

"Therefore" means "for that reason" or "as a consequence". How is this
property a consequence of reading driving level from efuse? Is it then
mutually exclusive with "realtek,driving-level"? But your schema does
not express it.

> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/int32
> + minimum: -8
> + maximum: 8
> +
> + realtek,disconnection-compensate:
> + description:
> + This adjusts the disconnection level compensation for the different
> + boards with different disconnection level.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/int32
> + minimum: -8
> + maximum: 8
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#phy-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + usb_port0_usb2phy: usb-phy@13214 {
> + compatible = "realtek,rtd1319d-usb2phy", "realtek,usb2phy";
> + reg = <0x13214 0x4>, <0x28280 0x4>;
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> +
> + realtek,driving-level = <0xe>;

Why this example is so empty? You have at least 6 more properties which
should be shown here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof