Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] tools: lib: perf: Implement riscv mmap support

From: Alexandre Ghiti
Date: Fri Jun 16 2023 - 05:08:56 EST


On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 10:43 AM Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 2:03 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > riscv now support mmaping hardware counters so add what's needed to
> > take advantage of that in libperf.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/perf/mmap.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > index 0d1634cedf44..65f250e0ef92 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > @@ -392,6 +392,71 @@ static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter)
> >
> > static u64 read_timestamp(void) { return read_sysreg(cntvct_el0); }
> >
> > +#elif __riscv_xlen == 64
> > +
>
> This is applicable for RV32 as well. No ?
> otherwise, you won't need CSR_CYCLEH

Admittedly, I have not checked rv32 at all in this series and the code
below is a copy-paste. I'd say that rv32 support is out of scope for
this series, is that ok with you?

>
> > +#define CSR_CYCLE 0xc00
> > +#define CSR_TIME 0xc01
> > +#define CSR_CYCLEH 0xc80
> > +
> > +#define csr_read(csr) \
> > +({ \
> > + register unsigned long __v; \
> > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("csrr %0, " #csr \
> > + : "=r" (__v) : \
> > + : "memory"); \
> > + __v; \
> > +})
> > +
> > +static unsigned long csr_read_num(int csr_num)
> > +{
> > +#define switchcase_csr_read(__csr_num, __val) {\
> > + case __csr_num: \
> > + __val = csr_read(__csr_num); \
> > + break; }
> > +#define switchcase_csr_read_2(__csr_num, __val) {\
> > + switchcase_csr_read(__csr_num + 0, __val) \
> > + switchcase_csr_read(__csr_num + 1, __val)}
> > +#define switchcase_csr_read_4(__csr_num, __val) {\
> > + switchcase_csr_read_2(__csr_num + 0, __val) \
> > + switchcase_csr_read_2(__csr_num + 2, __val)}
> > +#define switchcase_csr_read_8(__csr_num, __val) {\
> > + switchcase_csr_read_4(__csr_num + 0, __val) \
> > + switchcase_csr_read_4(__csr_num + 4, __val)}
> > +#define switchcase_csr_read_16(__csr_num, __val) {\
> > + switchcase_csr_read_8(__csr_num + 0, __val) \
> > + switchcase_csr_read_8(__csr_num + 8, __val)}
> > +#define switchcase_csr_read_32(__csr_num, __val) {\
> > + switchcase_csr_read_16(__csr_num + 0, __val) \
> > + switchcase_csr_read_16(__csr_num + 16, __val)}
> > +
> > + unsigned long ret = 0;
> > +
> > + switch (csr_num) {
> > + switchcase_csr_read_32(CSR_CYCLE, ret)
> > + switchcase_csr_read_32(CSR_CYCLEH, ret)
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +#undef switchcase_csr_read_32
> > +#undef switchcase_csr_read_16
> > +#undef switchcase_csr_read_8
> > +#undef switchcase_csr_read_4
> > +#undef switchcase_csr_read_2
> > +#undef switchcase_csr_read
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter)
> > +{
> > + return csr_read_num(CSR_CYCLE + counter);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u64 read_timestamp(void)
> > +{
> > + return csr_read_num(CSR_TIME);
> > +}
> > +
> > #else
> > static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter __maybe_unused) { return 0; }
> > static u64 read_timestamp(void) { return 0; }
> > --
> > 2.37.2
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Atish