Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] sched/core: Avoid double calling update_rq_clock() in __balance_push_cpu_stop()

From: Hao Jia
Date: Fri Jun 16 2023 - 03:57:21 EST




On 2023/6/15 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 04:20:10PM +0800, Hao Jia wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index a8be5415daba..1eca36299d8b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2398,7 +2398,6 @@ static struct rq *__migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
return rq;
- update_rq_clock(rq);
rq = move_queued_task(rq, rf, p, dest_cpu);
return rq;
@@ -2456,10 +2455,12 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
goto out;
}
- if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
+ if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
+ update_rq_clock(rq);
rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, arg->dest_cpu);
- else
+ } else {
p->wake_cpu = arg->dest_cpu;
+ }
/*
* XXX __migrate_task() can fail, at which point we might end

So now you've got update_rq_clock() in both callers, why not remove it
from __balance_push_cpu_stop() ?

Afaict nothing actually needs it before __migrate_task().


Thanks for your review.
I'm afraid not, the rq clock also needs to be updated before
select_fallback_rq() is called.


---
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -9435,8 +9435,6 @@ static int __balance_push_cpu_stop(void
raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
rq_lock(rq, &rf);
- update_rq_clock(rq);
-
if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
cpu = select_fallback_rq(rq->cpu, p);
rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, cpu);

If we just remove update_rq_clock() from __balance_push_cpu_stop(), we will get this warning.


[ 1260.960166] rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
[ 1260.960170] WARNING: CPU: 25 PID: 196 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1496 update_curr+0xf6/0x1f0

[ 1260.960318] Call Trace:
[ 1260.960320] <TASK>
[ 1260.960323] ? show_regs+0x5b/0x60
[ 1260.960327] ? __warn+0x89/0x140
[ 1260.960331] ? update_curr+0xf6/0x1f0
[ 1260.960334] ? report_bug+0x1b7/0x1e0
[ 1260.960338] ? __wake_up_klogd.part.25+0x5a/0x80
[ 1260.960342] ? handle_bug+0x45/0x80
[ 1260.960346] ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70
[ 1260.960348] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
[ 1260.960354] ? update_curr+0xf6/0x1f0
[ 1260.960356] ? update_curr+0xf6/0x1f0
[ 1260.960359] dequeue_entity+0x3b/0x410
[ 1260.960361] dequeue_task_fair+0xc7/0x3c0
[ 1260.960363] dequeue_task+0x30/0xf0
[ 1260.960365] __do_set_cpus_allowed+0x94/0x130
[ 1260.960366] do_set_cpus_allowed+0x38/0x60
[ 1260.960368] cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback+0x70/0x80
[ 1260.960372] select_fallback_rq+0x20f/0x250 <----
[ 1260.960374] __balance_push_cpu_stop+0x13f/0x1a0
[ 1260.960377] ? migration_cpu_stop+0x2b0/0x2b0
[ 1260.960379] cpu_stopper_thread+0xaf/0x140
[ 1260.960382] smpboot_thread_fn+0x158/0x220
[ 1260.960387] ? sort_range+0x30/0x30
[ 1260.960390] kthread+0xfe/0x130
[ 1260.960392] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 1260.960394] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 1260.960399] </TASK>

Thanks,
Hao