Re: [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Thu Jun 15 2023 - 17:43:17 EST

Next message: Edgecombe, Rick P: "Re: [patch 12/17] init: Invoke arch_cpu_finalize_init() earlier"
Previous message: Conor Dooley: "Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: clock: Bindings for Meson T7 clock controller"
In reply to: Akhil P Oommen: "Re: [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>> Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
>> but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
>> the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care
>> of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves.
>>
>> Reuse existing Adreno-common code and modify the deeply-GMU-infused
>> A6XX code to facilitate these GPUs. This involves if-ing out lots
>> of GMU callbacks and introducing a new type of GMU - GMU wrapper (it's
>> the actual name that Qualcomm uses in their downstream kernels).
>>
>> This is essentially a register region which is convenient to model
>> as a device. We'll use it for managing the GDSCs. The register
>> layout matches the actual GMU_CX/GX regions on the "real GMU" devices
>> and lets us reuse quite a bit of gmu_read/write/rmw calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 72 +++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c | 14 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 8 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 6 +
>> 6 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> index 5ba8cba69383..385ca3a12462 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> @@ -1437,6 +1437,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_get_irq(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, struct platform_device *pdev,
>>
>> void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>> {
>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
>> struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(gmu->dev);
>>
>> @@ -1462,10 +1463,12 @@ void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>> gmu->mmio = NULL;
>> gmu->rscc = NULL;
>>
>> - a6xx_gmu_memory_free(gmu);
>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + a6xx_gmu_memory_free(gmu);
>>
>> - free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
>> - free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
>> + free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
>> + free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
>> + }
>>
>> /* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
>> put_device(gmu->dev);
>> @@ -1484,6 +1487,69 @@ static int cxpd_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!pdev)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + gmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
>> +
>> + pm_runtime_enable(gmu->dev);
>> +
>> + /* Mark legacy for manual SPTPRAC control */
>> + gmu->legacy = true;
>> +
>> + /* Map the GMU registers */
>> + gmu->mmio = a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(pdev, "gmu");
>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->mmio)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->mmio);
>> + goto err_mmio;
>> + }
>> +
>> + gmu->cxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "cx");
>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->cxpd)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->cxpd);
>> + goto err_mmio;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!device_link_add(gmu->dev, gmu->cxpd, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto detach_cxpd;
>> + }
>> +
>> + init_completion(&gmu->pd_gate);
>> + complete_all(&gmu->pd_gate);
>> + gmu->pd_nb.notifier_call = cxpd_notifier_cb;
>> +
>> + /* Get a link to the GX power domain to reset the GPU */
>> + gmu->gxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "gx");
>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->gxpd)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->gxpd);
>> + goto err_mmio;
>> + }
>> +
>> + gmu->initialized = true;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +detach_cxpd:
>> + dev_pm_domain_detach(gmu->cxpd, false);
>> +
>> +err_mmio:
>> + iounmap(gmu->mmio);
>> +
>> + /* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
>> + put_device(gmu->dev);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>> {
>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> index 58bf405b85d8..0a44762dbb6d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline bool _a6xx_check_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>
>> /* Check that the GMU is idle */
>> - if (!a6xx_gmu_isidle(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && !a6xx_gmu_isidle(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>> return false;
>>
>> /* Check tha the CX master is idle */
>> @@ -1018,10 +1018,13 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - /* Make sure the GMU keeps the GPU on while we set it up */
>> - a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + /* Make sure the GMU keeps the GPU on while we set it up */
>> + a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
>> + }
>>
>> /* Clear GBIF halt in case GX domain was not collapsed */
>> if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
>> @@ -1148,6 +1151,17 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> 0x3f0243f0);
>> }
>>
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + /* Do it here, as GMU wrapper only inits the GMU for memory reservation etc. */
>> +
>> + /* Set up the CX GMU counter 0 to count busy ticks */
>> + gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_AO_GPU_CX_BUSY_MASK, 0xff000000);
>> +
>> + /* Enable power counter 0 */
>> + gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_SELECT_0, 0xff, BIT(5));
>> + gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_ENABLE, 1);
>> + }
>
> nit: For gmu targets, we do this at a6xx_rpmh_start() which is an odd place
> to keep this. But I don't know the reason why it was decided to keep it
> there. I don't see any reason why we cannot keep it here for both
> gmu/gmu-wrapper like in the downstream driver.
I split it up into a separate patch and reused for the next revision.
Tested on A630, the GMU doesn't complain.

>
>> +
>> /* Protect registers from the CP */
>> a6xx_set_cp_protect(gpu);
>>
>> @@ -1237,6 +1251,8 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> }
>>
>> out:
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> + return ret;
>> /*
>> * Tell the GMU that we are done touching the GPU and it can start power
>> * management
>> @@ -1271,9 +1287,6 @@ static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> adreno_dump(gpu);
>> }
>>
>> -#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_TIMEOUT 100
>> -#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK 0x00f0
>> -
>> static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> @@ -1311,6 +1324,15 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> */
>> gpu->active_submits = 0;
>>
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + /* Drain the outstanding traffic on memory buses */
>> + a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions(adreno_gpu, true);
>> +
>> + /* Reset the GPU to a clean state */
>> + a6xx_gpu_sw_reset(gpu, true);
>> + a6xx_gpu_sw_reset(gpu, false);
>> + }
>> +
>> reinit_completion(&gmu->pd_gate);
>> dev_pm_genpd_add_notifier(gmu->cxpd, &gmu->pd_nb);
>> dev_pm_genpd_synced_poweroff(gmu->cxpd);
>> @@ -1461,7 +1483,8 @@ static void a6xx_fault_detect_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> * Force the GPU to stay on until after we finish
>> * collecting information
>> */
>> - gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 1);
>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> + gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 1);
>>
>> DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
>> "gpu fault ring %d fence %x status %8.8X rb %4.4x/%4.4x ib1 %16.16llX/%4.4x ib2 %16.16llX/%4.4x\n",
>> @@ -1592,6 +1615,10 @@ static void a6xx_llc_activate(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>>
>> static void a6xx_llc_slices_destroy(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>> {
>> + /* No LLCC on non-RPMh (and by extension, non-GMU) SoCs */
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(&a6xx_gpu->base))
>> + return;
>> +
>> llcc_slice_putd(a6xx_gpu->llc_slice);
>> llcc_slice_putd(a6xx_gpu->htw_llc_slice);
>> }
>> @@ -1601,6 +1628,10 @@ static void a6xx_llc_slices_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> {
>> struct device_node *phandle;
>>
>> + /* No LLCC on non-RPMh (and by extension, non-GMU) SoCs */
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(&a6xx_gpu->base))
>> + return;
>> +
>> /*
>> * There is a different programming path for targets with an mmu500
>> * attached, so detect if that is the case
>> @@ -1670,7 +1701,7 @@ void a6xx_gpu_sw_reset(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool assert)
>> udelay(100);
>> }
>>
>> -static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>> @@ -1690,10 +1721,58 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>
>> a6xx_llc_activate(a6xx_gpu);
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> +static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> +{
>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>> + unsigned long freq = gpu->fast_rate;
>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + gpu->needs_hw_init = true;
>> +
>> + trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>
> Where is this lock initialized? If the init was moved out of
> a6xx_gmu_init(), can you please share that patch?
12abd735f030 ("drm/msm/a6xx: initialize GMU mutex earlier")

>
>> +
>> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(&gpu->pdev->dev, &freq);
>> + if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
>> + goto err_set_opp;
>> + }
>> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
>> +
>> + /* Set the core clock and bus bw, having VDD scaling in mind */
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, opp);
>> +
>> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->dev);
>> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->gxpd);
>> +
>> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_bulk_clk;
>> +
>> + /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
>> + if (ret) {
>> +err_bulk_clk:
>
> Goto jump directly to another block looks odd to me. Why do you need this label
> anyway?
If clk_bulk_prepare_enable() fails, trying to proceed will hang the
platform with unclocked accesses. We need to unwind everything that
has been done up until that point, in reverse order.

>
>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + }
>> +err_set_opp:
>
> Generally, it is better to name the label based on what you do here. For
> eg: "unlock_lock:".
That seems to be a mixed bag all throughout the kernel, I've seen many
usages of err_(what went wrong)

>
> Also, this function is small enough that it is better to return directly
> in case of error. I think that would be more readable.
Not really, adding the necessary cleanup steps in `if (ret)`
blocks would roughly double the function's size.

>
>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>> +
>> + if (!ret)
>> + msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>> @@ -1720,7 +1799,40 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>> +static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> +{
>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + trace_msm_gpu_suspend(0);
>> +
>> + msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>
> Again, is this initialized somewhere?
>
>> +
>> + /* Drain the outstanding traffic on memory buses */
>> + a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions(adreno_gpu, true);
>> +
>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
>> +
>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->gxpd);
>> + dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->dev);
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>> +
>> + if (a6xx_gpu->shadow_bo)
>> + for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++)
>> + a6xx_gpu->shadow[i] = 0;
>> +
>> + gpu->suspend_count++;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int a6xx_gmu_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>> {
>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>> @@ -1739,6 +1851,12 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>> +{
>> + *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct msm_ringbuffer *a6xx_active_ring(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>> @@ -2004,8 +2122,8 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
>> .set_param = adreno_set_param,
>> .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
>> .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
>> - .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
>> - .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend,
>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_gmu_pm_resume,
>> .recover = a6xx_recover,
>> .submit = a6xx_submit,
>> .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
>> @@ -2020,6 +2138,35 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
>> #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>> .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
>> .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
>> +#endif
>> + .create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
>> + .create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
>> + .get_rptr = a6xx_get_rptr,
>> + .progress = a6xx_progress,
>> + },
>> + .get_timestamp = a6xx_gmu_get_timestamp,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs_gmuwrapper = {
>> + .base = {
>> + .get_param = adreno_get_param,
>> + .set_param = adreno_set_param,
>> + .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
>> + .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
>> + .recover = a6xx_recover,
>> + .submit = a6xx_submit,
>> + .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
>> + .irq = a6xx_irq,
>> + .destroy = a6xx_destroy,
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>> + .show = a6xx_show,
>> +#endif
>> + .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy,
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>> + .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
>> + .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
>> #endif
>> .create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
>> .create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
>> @@ -2050,15 +2197,31 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>
>> adreno_gpu->registers = NULL;
>>
>> + /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
>> + node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
>> + /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
>> + BUG_ON(!node);
>> +
>> + adreno_gpu->gmu_is_wrapper = of_device_is_compatible(node, "qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper");
>> +
>> /*
>> * We need to know the platform type before calling into adreno_gpu_init
>> * so that the hw_apriv flag can be correctly set. Snoop into the info
>> * and grab the revision number
>> */
>> info = adreno_info(config->rev);
>> -
>> - if (info && (info->revn == 650 || info->revn == 660 ||
>> - adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 3, 5, ANY_ID), info->rev)))
>> + if (!info)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + /* Assign these early so that we can use the is_aXYZ helpers */
>> + /* Numeric revision IDs (e.g. 630) */
>> + adreno_gpu->revn = info->revn;
>> + /* New-style ADRENO_REV()-only */
>> + adreno_gpu->rev = info->rev;
>> + /* Quirk data */
>> + adreno_gpu->info = info;
>> +
>> + if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a660_family(adreno_gpu))
>> adreno_gpu->base.hw_apriv = true;
>>
>> a6xx_llc_slices_init(pdev, a6xx_gpu);
>> @@ -2069,7 +2232,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> }
>>
>> - ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_gmuwrapper, 1);
>> + else
>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
>> if (ret) {
>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> @@ -2082,13 +2248,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>> if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_7c3(adreno_gpu))
>> priv->gpu_clamp_to_idle = true;
>>
>> - /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
>> - node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
>> -
>> - /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
>> - BUG_ON(!node);
>> -
>> - ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>> + else
>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>> of_node_put(node);
>> if (ret) {
>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>> index aa70390ee1c6..c788b06e72da 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
>> void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
>>
>> int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
>> void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu);
>>
>> void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>> index 30ecdff363e7..4e5d650578c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>> @@ -1041,16 +1041,18 @@ struct msm_gpu_state *a6xx_gpu_state_get(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> /* Get the generic state from the adreno core */
>> adreno_gpu_state_get(gpu, &a6xx_state->base);
>>
>> - a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> + a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>
>> - a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
>> - a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
>> - a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
>> + a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
>> + a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
>> + a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
>> /
>> - a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
>> + a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
>> + }
>>
>> /* If GX isn't on the rest of the data isn't going to be accessible */
>> - if (!a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && !a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>> return &a6xx_state->base;
>>
>> /* Get the banks of indexed registers */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> index 6934cee07d42..5c5901d65950 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> @@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ int adreno_load_fw(struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu)
>> if (!adreno_gpu->info->fw[i])
>> continue;
>>
>> + /* Skip loading GMU firwmare with GMU Wrapper */
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && i == ADRENO_FW_GMU)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> /* Skip if the firmware has already been loaded */
>> if (adreno_gpu->fw[i])
>> continue;
>> @@ -1074,8 +1078,8 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
>> u32 speedbin;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use */
>> - if (config->rev.core < 6) {
>> + /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use (or is absent). */
>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || config->rev.core < 6) {
>> /*
>> * This can only be done before devm_pm_opp_of_add_table(), or
>> * dev_pm_opp_set_config() will WARN_ON()
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> index f62612a5c70f..ee5352bc5329 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct adreno_gpu {
>> * code (a3xx_gpu.c) and stored in this common location.
>> */
>> const unsigned int *reg_offsets;
>> + bool gmu_is_wrapper;
>> };
>> #define to_adreno_gpu(x) container_of(x, struct adreno_gpu, base)
>>
>> @@ -145,6 +146,11 @@ struct adreno_platform_config {
>>
>> bool adreno_cmp_rev(struct adreno_rev rev1, struct adreno_rev rev2);
>>
>> +static inline bool adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>> +{
>> + return gpu->gmu_is_wrapper;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool adreno_is_a2xx(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>> {
>> return (gpu->revn < 300);
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
>
> I am still not fully onboard with the idea of gmu_wrapper node in devicetree.
> Aside from that, I don't see any other issue. Please check the few comments I left.
Thanks for your review!

Konrad
>
> -Akhil.
>

Next message: Edgecombe, Rick P: "Re: [patch 12/17] init: Invoke arch_cpu_finalize_init() earlier"
Previous message: Conor Dooley: "Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: clock: Bindings for Meson T7 clock controller"
In reply to: Akhil P Oommen: "Re: [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]