On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:52 AM Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
<yakoyoku@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I can't remember that if this panic it will mention the path on it.
Though if it does, then use something more explicit than
`.unwrap()`.
It doesn't print it, and I am happy to make things more explicit, but
in which case(s) do you see it failing?
Please do not use unwrap here, one can easily create a path that
it's not compliant under `rust/test/doctests/kernel` and get no
clue about where this script has failed. Use `.expect()` or
something else instead.
The folder is removed every time, so that should not happen I think.
Yes, you can still hack things and call the script manually, but I
wouldn't call that "easily".
Nevertheless, I am happy to change it if we think there is a risk,
e.g. `rustdoc` changing the pattern (though we pin the version so
far).
Thanks for taking a look Martin!
Cheers,
Miguel