Re: [PATCH 5/9] drm: atmel-hlcdc: add compatible string check for XLCDC and HLCDC

From: Manikandan.M
Date: Thu Jun 15 2023 - 01:53:07 EST


On 14/06/23 12:19, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote:
> On 13.06.2023 10:04, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote:
>> From: Durai Manickam KR <durai.manickamkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add compatible string check to differentiate XLCDC and HLCDC code
>> within the atmel-hlcdc driver files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Durai Manickam KR <durai.manickamkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.c | 7 +++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.c
>> index d7ad828e9e8c..fbbd2592efc7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.c
>> @@ -761,6 +761,13 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_dc_load(struct drm_device *dev)
>> if (!dc)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + /* SAM9X7 supports XLCDC */
>> + if (!strcmp(match->compatible, "microchip,sam9x7-xlcdc"))
>
> This could be avoided if ix_xlcd in added in driver data.
Sure, I will check for the feasibility of the code.
Thank you
>
>> + dc->is_xlcdc = true;
>> + else
>> + /* Other SoC's that supports HLCDC IP */
>> + dc->is_xlcdc = false;
>> +
>> dc->desc = match->data;
>> dc->hlcdc = dev_get_drvdata(dev->dev->parent);
>> dev->dev_private = dc;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
>> index aed1742b3665..804e4d476f2b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_dc.h
>> @@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ struct atmel_hlcdc_dc {
>> u32 imr;
>> struct drm_atomic_state *state;
>> } suspend;
>> + bool is_xlcdc;
>> };
>>
>> extern struct atmel_hlcdc_formats atmel_hlcdc_plane_rgb_formats;
>

--
Thanks and Regards,
Manikandan M.