Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add RISC-V advanced PLIC

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Wed Jun 14 2023 - 15:28:13 EST


Hey Anup,

Mostly looks good, once minor comment.

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 09:04:12PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:

> + riscv,children:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 1024
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + A list of child APLIC domains for the given APLIC domain. Each child
> + APLIC domain is assigned a child index in increasing order, with the
> + first child APLIC domain assigned child index 0. The APLIC domain child
> + index is used by firmware to delegate interrupts from the given APLIC
> + domain to a particular child APLIC domain.
> +
> + riscv,delegation:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 1024
> + items:
> + items:
> + - description: child APLIC domain phandle
> + - description: first interrupt number of the parent APLIC domain (inclusive)
> + - description: last interrupt number of the parent APLIC domain (inclusive)
> + description:
> + A interrupt delegation list where each entry is a triple consisting
> + of child APLIC domain phandle, first interrupt number of the parent
> + APLIC domain, and last interrupt number of the parent APLIC domain.
> + Firmware must configure interrupt delegation registers based on
> + interrupt delegation list.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupt-controller
> + - "#interrupt-cells"
> + - riscv,num-sources
> +
> +anyOf:
> + - required:
> + - interrupts-extended
> + - required:
> + - msi-parent

Not sure if you missed this from the last version, but I asked if we
needed a
dependencies:
riscv,delegate: [ riscv,children ]

IOW, I don't think it is valid to have a delegation without having
children?

Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers,
Conor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature