Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: qcom: Use of_reserved_mem_lookup()

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Wed Jun 14 2023 - 11:09:32 EST


On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:34:54AM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> Reserved memory can be either looked up using the generic function
> of_address_to_resource() or using the special of_reserved_mem_lookup().
> The latter has the advantage that it ensures that the referenced memory
> region was really reserved and is not e.g. status = "disabled".
>
> of_reserved_mem also supports allocating reserved memory dynamically at
> boot time. This works only when using of_reserved_mem_lookup() since
> there won't be a fixed address in the device tree.
>
> Switch the code to use of_reserved_mem_lookup(), similar to
> qcom_q6v5_wcss.c which is using it already. There is no functional
> difference for static reserved memory allocations.
>
> While at it this also adds two missing of_node_put() calls in
> qcom_q6v5_pas.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> See e.g. [1] for an example of dynamically allocated reserved memory.
> (This patch does *not* depend on [1] and is useful without as well...)
>
> NOTE: Changes in qcom_q6v5_adsp.c and qcom_q6v5_pas.c are untested,
> I only checked qcom_q6v5_mss.c and qcom_wcnss.c on MSM8916/DB410c.
> The code changes are pretty similar for all of those though.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230510-dt-resv-bottom-up-v1-5-3bf68873dbed@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 22 ++++++++--------
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 35 +++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 24 ++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> index 6777a3bd6226..948b3d00a564 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> -#include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> @@ -637,28 +637,26 @@ static int adsp_init_mmio(struct qcom_adsp *adsp,
>
> static int adsp_alloc_memory_region(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
> {
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem = NULL;
> struct device_node *node;
> - struct resource r;
> - int ret;
>
> node = of_parse_phandle(adsp->dev->of_node, "memory-region", 0);
> + if (node)
> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
> + of_node_put(node);
> +
> if (!node) {
> - dev_err(adsp->dev, "no memory-region specified\n");
> + dev_err(adsp->dev, "unable to resolve memory-region\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &r);
> - of_node_put(node);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - adsp->mem_phys = adsp->mem_reloc = r.start;
> - adsp->mem_size = resource_size(&r);

Aren't you missing a check for !rmem here? (The others has it)

Regards,
Bjorn