Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] axis-fifo: cleanup space issues with fops struct

[Prathu Baronia]

On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 12:31:11AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Note this is only subjectively better. IMHO with just a single space
> this is perfectly readable. Aligning the = might look nice, but it's
> also annoying at times. When you add another member (e.g.
> .iterate_shared) you either add a line that doesn't match all others, or
> you have to touch all other lines of that struct which (objectively?)
> hurts readability of that patch. Also for generated patches this kind of
> alignment yields extra work. (See for example
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230525205840.734432-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> which required semi-manual fixup to keep the alignment after coccinelle
> generated the patch.)
> 
Agreed, that this would create more troubles than benefits.

> If you still think this is a good idea, I'd ask you to stick to one
> style for the whole file. e.g. axis_fifo_driver uses inconsistent
> and different indention.
> 
> A thing that IMHO is more useful to change here, is the name fops; I'd
> suggest something like axis_fifo_fops (and also use prefixes for some
> other symbols like "get_dts_property"). In 6.4-rc1 my ctags file knows
> about 64 different places that define something called "fops".
> 
Agreed. Upon further walkthrough I think this driver requires a lot of cleanup
so I will leave that cleanup for another dedicated patch series for now.

Prathu