Re: [PATCH 2/2] ufs: don't use the fair tag sharings

[Bart Van Assche]

On 5/18/23 00:55, Yu Kuai wrote:
> 在 2023/05/18 10:23, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> > On 5/17/23 18:49, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > Currently, fair share from hctx_may_queue() requires two
> > > atomic_read(active_queues and active_requests), I think this smoothing
> > > method can be placed into get_tag fail path, for example, the more times
> > > a disk failed to get tag in a period of time, the more tag this disk can
> > > get, and all the information can be updated here(perhaps directly
> > > record how many tags a disk can get, then hctx_may_queue() still only
> > > require 2 atomic_read()).
> >
> > That sounds interesting to me. Do you perhaps plan to implement this 
> > approach and to post it as a patch?
>
> Of course, I'll try to send a RFC patch.

Hi Kuai,

Has this RFC patch already been posted or did I perhaps miss it?

Thanks,

Bart.