[PATCH v2 nolibc 44/53] selftests/nolibc: fix up compile warning with glibc on x86_64

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon Jun 12 2023 - 16:51:03 EST


From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Compiling nolibc-test.c with gcc on x86_64 got such warning:

tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c: In function ‘expect_eq’:
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c:177:24: warning: format ‘%lld’ expects argument of type ‘long long int’, but argument 2 has type ‘uint64_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
177 | llen += printf(" = %lld ", expr);
| ~~~^ ~~~~
| | |
| | uint64_t {aka long unsigned int}
| long long int
| %ld

It because that glibc defines uint64_t as "unsigned long int" when word
size (means sizeof(long)) is 64bit (see include/bits/types.h), but
nolibc directly use the 64bit "unsigned long long" (see
tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h), which is simpler, seems kernel uses it
too (include/uapi/asm-generic/int-ll64.h).

use a simple conversion to solve it.

Suggested-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230529130449.GA2813@xxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index cfc7b270c397..dcb0bd079d15 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int expect_eq(uint64_t expr, int llen, uint64_t val)
{
int ret = !(expr == val);

- llen += printf(" = %lld ", expr);
+ llen += printf(" = %lld ", (long long)expr);
pad_spc(llen, 64, ret ? "[FAIL]\n" : " [OK]\n");
return ret;
}
--
2.40.1