Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add Allwinner D1/T113s/R329/T507 SoCs GPADC

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Sat Jun 10 2023 - 11:06:50 EST


Hey,

On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 03:29:08PM +0300, Maksim Kiselev wrote:
> From: Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Allwinner's D1/T113s/R329/T507 SoCs have a new general purpose ADC.
> This ADC is the same for all of this SoCs. The only difference is
> the number of available channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../iio/adc/allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc.yaml | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2b59844b7c07
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Allwinner D1 General Purpose ADC
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc
> +
> + "#io-channel-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> + "#size-cells":
> + const: 0
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + resets:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^channel@([0-15])$":
> + $ref: adc.yaml
> + type: object
> + description:
> + Represents the internal channels of the ADC.
> +
> + properties:
> + reg:
> + items:
> + minimum: 0
> + maximum: 15
> +
> + required:
> + - reg
> +
> + additionalProperties: false
> +
> +required:
> + - "#io-channel-cells"
> + - clocks
> + - compatible
> + - interrupts
> + - reg
> + - resets
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false

How come this one changed to unevaluatedProperties: false?
Wasn't it for the ADC that we previously discussed whether
additionalProperties: false was correct or not?

Cheers,
Conor.

> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/sun20i-d1-ccu.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/reset/sun20i-d1-ccu.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +
> + gpadc: adc@2009000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-gpadc";
> + reg = <0x2009000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_GPADC>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_GPADC>;
> + interrupts = <73 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> +
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + channel@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + channel@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + };
> + };
> +...
> --
> 2.39.2
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature